Corona on Trial

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Syria referendum goes ahead amid military onslaught

    BEIRUT (Reuters) - At least 59 Syrian civilians and soldiers were killed on Sunday in bloodshed that coincided with a vote on a new constitution that could keep President Bashar al-Assad in power until 2028.

    Assad says the referendum shows his commitment to democratic reform while Western powers and Syrians involved in an 11-month-old revolt against his rule have described it as a farce.

    The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said a military bombardment of opposition districts in the city of Homs had killed 12 civilians while security forces killed three people when they opened fire on a demonstration in Damascus.

    The British-based Observatory said 21 other civilians died and rebels killed 23 members of the security forces across Syria, scene of what has become an increasingly militarized revolt against four decades of Assad family rule.

    Voting took place in the referendum on a new constitution, which Assad says will lead to a multi-party parliamentary election in three months. The result is expected to be announced on Monday.

    "What should we be voting for, whether to die by bombardment or by bullets? This is the only choice we have," said Waleed Fares, an activist in the Khalidiyah district of Homs, where bombardment is now in its fourth week.

    "We have been trapped in our houses for 23 days. We cannot go out, except into some alleys. Markets, schools and government buildings are closed, and there is very little movement on the streets because of snipers," he said.

    He said another besieged and battered district, Baba Amro, had had no food or water for three days. "Homs in general has no electricity for 18 hours a day." Tight curbs on independent reporting in Syria make witness reports hard to verify.

    Elsewhere in Homs, rebel fighters burned a building of Assad's ruling Baath Party in the Hamidiyeh district of the old city and attacked an armored vehicle, the Observatory said.

    The Interior Ministry acknowledged obliquely that security conditions had disrupted voting, saying: "The referendum on a new constitution is taking place in a normal way in most provinces so far, with a large turnout, except in some areas."

    The Syrian government, backed by Russia, China and Iran, and undeterred by Western and Arab pressure to halt its assaults, says it is fighting foreign-backed "armed terrorist groups."

    "NO DESIRE FOR REFORM"

    Syria's Prime Minister Adel Safar, asked about opposition calls for a boycott, said this showed a lack of interest in dialogue. "There are some groups that have a Western and foreign agenda and do not want reforms in Syria and want to divert Syria's steadfastness," he told reporters in Damascus.

    "We are not concerned with this. We care about ... spreading democracy and freedom in the country," Safar said.

    "If there was a genuine desire for reform, there would have been movement from all groups, especially the opposition, to start dialogue immediately with the government to achieve the reforms and implement them on the ground."

    The outside world has been powerless to restrain Assad's drive to crush the revolt, which has the potential to slide into a sectarian conflict between Syria's Sunni Muslim majority and the president's minority Alawite sect.

    Unwilling to intervene militarily and unable to get the U.N. Security Council to act in the teeth of Russian and Chinese opposition, Western powers have imposed their own sanctions on Syria and backed an Arab League call for Assad to step down.

    While the West dismisses talk of a Libya-style NATO role to support Assad's opponents, Gulf Arab states have pushed for a more forceful stance. Saudi Arabia said on Friday it would back the idea of arming rebels - a proposal likely to alarm Moscow.

    "I very much hope the United States and other countries ... do not try to set a military scenario in motion in Syria without sanction from the U.N. Security Council," Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said.

    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that any foreign intervention could just fuel further violence.

    "I think there is every possibility of a civil war. Outside intervention would not prevent that, it would probably expedite it," she told BBC television in an interview.

    "We have a very dangerous set of actors in the region: al Qaeda, Hamas and those who are on our terrorist list claiming to support the opposition. You have many Syrians more worried about what could come next ...

    "If you bring in automatic weapons, which you can maybe smuggle across the border, what do they do against tanks and heavy artillery? There is such a much more complex set of factors."

    German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle said Sunday's referendum was "nothing but a farce."

    "Sham votes cannot contribute to a solution of the crisis. Assad needs to put an end to the violence and clear the way for a political transition," he said in a statement.

    HARROWING CONDITIONS

    The military onslaught on parts of Homs has created harrowing conditions for civilians, rebels and journalists.

    A video posted by activists on YouTube showed Mohammad al-Mohammad, a doctor at a makeshift clinic in Baba Amro, holding a 15-year-old boy hit in the neck by shrapnel and spitting blood.

    "It is late at night and Baba Amro is still being bombarded. We can do nothing for this boy," said the doctor, who has also been treating Western journalists wounded in the city.

    American correspondent Marie Colvin and French photographer Remi Ochlik were killed in the bombardment of Homs last week and two other Western journalists were wounded. The group is still trapped there despite Red Cross efforts to extricate them.

    The International Red Cross and Syrian Arab Red Crescent could not get into Baba Amro on Sunday and were still negotiating with authorities and opposition, the ICRC said.

    Syrian authorities had not responded to a request for a ceasefire to allow the wounded to be evacuated, it added, and conditions were worsening by the hour.

    "Whether they are women, children, men, Syrian journalists, or foreign journalists, all have the same status. They need to reach medical facilities regardless of their status without any distinction," ICRC chief spokeswoman Carla Haddad said.

    In Hama, another city with a bloody record of resistance to Baathist rule, one activist said nobody was taking part in the referendum. "We will not vote on a constitution drafted by our killer," he said by satellite telephone, asking not to be named.

    If the constitution is approved in the vote, a foregone conclusion, it would drop an article making Assad's Baath party the leader of state and society, allow political pluralism and enact a presidential limit of two seven-year terms.

    But the limit will not be enforced retrospectively, meaning that Assad, already in power for 11 years, could serve another two terms after his current one expires in 2014.

    Dozens of people lined up to vote in two polling stations visited by a Reuters journalist in Damascus. "I've come to vote for President Bashar, God protect him and give him victory over his enemies," said Samah Turkmani, in his 50s.

    Another voter, Majed Elias, said: "This is a national duty, whether I agree or not, I have to come and vote."

    This is Syria's third referendum since Assad inherited power from his late father. The first installed him as president in 2000 with an official 97.29 percent 'Yes' vote. The second renewed his term seven years later with 97.62 percent in favor.

    (Additional reporting by Khaled Yacoub Oweis in Amman, Mariam Karouny, Erika Solomon and Dominic Evans in Beirut, Christian Ruettger in Berlin and Arshad Mohammed in Rabat and Stephanie Nebehay in Geneva; editing by Andrew Roche)

    How do you feel about this article?

     
    • itsmeagain  •  2 months ago
      Sure we will go in and help, lose our men and women, use our money and equipment and then what. They start burning our flag and spread hatred for the USA. They will blame us for everything bad that happens forgetting how it is today. Just like Iraq and Afghanistan. Forget it. The people need to over throw their own government and stop asking for help.
      • Arizona 2 months ago
        The "people" who want an over-throw are a tribal minority and their "want" is being supplied and fueled by US. There was and is no, spontaneous uprising. We and Israel are 'creating' it. We are hoping even more get killed and maimed so we can use that as the excuse to intervene. As usual.
      • Ron 2 months ago
        There are many reasons that other countries hate the USA. One of the reasons, and perhaps the biggest one, is the CIA terrorists that initiate troubles in so many countries. They were into Iraq before 1958 and Saddam Hussein was made an asset then and Saddam was 'asked' by the CIA to assassinate the leader of Iraq. Saddam tried, failed and went into exile. In 1963 the CIA orchestrated a bloody coup in Iraq.

        This is one partial example of many actions by the USA and its CIA. The USA is there biggest exporter of terror on our planet.

        The American war crimes are huge and these are real terror action. How many people each day does the USA kill? The number is big but you don't hear it on your media because American and, most western, media is totally biased.

        Also, many demonstrations in Syria are pro-Assad. We can not take sides as we are doing. It only causes more problems. It's also really crazy the hear monarchies and such speak out about Syria not having enough democracy!
      • Eventhoenterprise 2 months ago
        Wow, this is Hipocrisy at its best!
    • Fred  •  San Antonio, United States  •  2 months ago
      It is interesting how virtually all of the comments now seem to be running against the West and its involvement in Syria. I wonder what has changed ... maybe nobody believes Clinton and Obama and Sarkozy and Cameron and CNN and the NY Times and Reuters anymore!
      • RobbyR 2 months ago
        Maybe you should read the article. Secretary Clinton said it pretty clearly- the US would like to see change, not civil war, and military intervention would lead to civil war.
      • Monte Phillips 2 months ago
        yea, she ran that fat mouth of hers like that about Lybia too didnt she? PFFFFFFFT
      • Independent Bear 2 months ago
        Secretary Clinton did not suggest troops though. She is looking for support to remove Assad just like she got support for removing Gadhafi without committing troops. That does NOT ensure peace and good times ahead. It DOES remove a murdering dictator from office. Peace and good times must be created by the people there, not by outsiders. It takes time, and sweat and, yes, perhaps some blood.
    • Tom  •  2 months ago
      Our invasion of Iraq and the killing of Sadam solved nothing.
      Our overthrow of the Afghan government solved nothing.
      Our overthrow of the Libyan government and the killing of Gadhafi solved nothing.
      We could intervene in Syria and destroy that government, which means a war with Iran, and it would solve nothing.

      Trying to Americanize these people is about as stupid as trying to Americanize the little green men on mars.
      • BFP 2 months ago
        Tom, you hit the nail on the head.
      • Poppa Smurf 2 months ago
        Our invasion of Iraq helped kill Sadam, Our overthrow of the the Afghan government helped kill Bin Laden, and the overthrow of the Libyan government aided in the death of Gadhafi. Sounds like a good day to me.
      • Arizona 2 months ago
        You're right Tom. Poppa Smurf is just another, typical "good christian" lynch mob'er heard from. Those folks over there are going to hate US for it for generations. We've become the new Nazi Germany. At home as well as abroad.
    • Robert  •  Moscow, United States  •  2 months ago
      We don't need to be in this war.
      • aboori aboori 2 months ago
        Hell yes
      • NOFEAR 2 months ago
        "People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people."

        PS. You Work for me, you must following ORDER and get PAID, everything is a TOOLS It's time to giving up protect and serves for their GOVT. WE NEED TO STAND TOGETHER WORLD HUMAN KIND.
      • BB 2 months ago
        The USA needs to mind it's own business and get involved helping our country at home.
    • chantal  •  2 months ago
      Americans supporting the opposition would be supporting Al Qaeda. Let them work it out.
      • Makatak 2 months ago
        Maybe, just Maybe, Al Qaeda could become alleys , someday, It happened with germany, russia, Quadafi, anti christians in afganastan, Lybia, numerous puppet dictatorships, japan etc. Me thinks you have to work with the hand you're delt. and don't sit on your hands. Nato and other bodies should be on the ground on day one, which was months ago regarding syria. like a fire alarm system . early intervention
      • Ron 2 months ago
        Countries could more easily deal with the hand they're dealt if countries like the USA and efforts by CIA terrorists were taken out of the picture.
      • Jeyoung 2 months ago
        @Makatak You forgot 911!
    • Roscoe P. Coltrane  •  2 months ago
      The USA needs to stay away. First off, everyone in that region hates us with a passion. Secondly we have enough of our own problems. Thirdly, we've had enough young men and women come back in a box already. We don't need anymore. Let Syria decide it's own fate.
    • J  •  2 months ago
      we should clean up our #$%$ at home and act as an example by bringing the criminals to justice
    • Vladimir  •  2 months ago
      This "news" don't say that yesterday a french military commander has officially surrendered to syrian forces and requested POW treatment, after his unit was captured. ON SYRIAN SOIL.
    • nicholasjosue  •  Pleasanton, United States  •  2 months ago
      The Arab League can not direct military intervention, as requested by Qatar, because it remains divided and has no army. and Yes they can legitimise the intervention of others and put pressure on Russia. in a few words!!!!!! the arab league sucks!!!!!!!!!
    • JK  •  Coeur D'Alene, United States  •  2 months ago
      Let them work it out. Crimes against humanity are being committed in the majority of African countries. The US doesn't get involved with those countries, so Syria should be no exception
    • Steve  •  2 months ago
      So there is ONE GUY 'Omar' who Reuters gives the microphone to evaluate the situation. IS THIS JOURNALISM? Everone should listen to Omar. I competely trust this guy. The last thing the corporate media would do is allow someone to verify their sources.
    • Time Out  •  2 months ago
      Their votes count about as much as ours do.
    • JR  •  Vista, United States  •  2 months ago
      I do not think the world would be in such a mess if we just did not get involved in the dealing of other countries. We need to be independent of other countries and stand on our own..and take care of our own.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  2 months ago
      Syrian rebels are armed and joint with al-Qeada terrorists. Let them fight their civil war, we stay out.
    • JT  •  2 months ago
      The usa needs to worry about the usa s problems.
    • john  •  2 months ago
      How come we don't see photos of the polling station, since Reuters is covering this vote?
      We are constantly fed a diet of Youtube clips that may or may not reflect the reality on the ground.
      I am an Arab (not Syrian) African American with no love lost for any leader that overstayed their welcome anywhere in the world, but the manipulation of youth/people through news and social media. The control of chaos thru covert actions, introduction of arms in Africa and Middle-East is absolutely revolting.
    • Alan  •  2 months ago
      Notice biased media use the words "civilians" for rebels killed. Seemed no rebels have been killed ONLY soldiers and civilans when reality .. Western (french one of whom was a colonel) were killed.
    • Ted Pert  •  New York, United States  •  2 months ago
      DO NOT GET INVOLVED!!!!!!
    • Nathan  •  Pleasanton, United States  •  2 months ago
      Coming to a neighborhood near you!
    • Jon  •  Marietta, United States  •  2 months ago
      Why isn't anyone talking about the genocide of black Libyans at the hands of NATO backed rebels? Because the world does not care about black people. I love answering my own questions.
    POLL
    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options