Corona on Trial

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Oscars aim for surprises to spice up show

    LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - After the curtain rises on Sunday's Oscars, producers hope a few surprise winners and heartfelt acceptance speeches will spice up the program in which silent movie "The Artist" is widely seen as the choice for best movie.

    The world's top film honors are in jeopardy of losing their status as the second most-watched TV event in the United States behind professional football's Super Bowl if the show can't lure more than 40 million viewers, which could be difficult.

    Producers have brought back popular host Billy Crystal to provide laughter, but the best solution for a lively TV awards program, sponsors at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences say, is a group of surprise winners or ones who give genuinely emotional or rousing acceptance speeches.

    "Be memorable, and you will be remembered," co-producer Don Mischer told nominees at a recent luncheon.

    It's hard to forget 73-year-old Jack Palance doing one-arm pushups on the Oscar stage after winning best supporting actor for 1991's "City Slickers," or more recently the heartfelt speech by writers Glen Hansard and Marketa Irglova of best song winner "Falling Slowly" from 2007 film, "Once."

    The Oscars need a few surprises because silent movie romance "The Artist," while critically lauded, has generated only around $30 million at U.S. and Canadian box offices, and the Oscars generally enjoy larger TV audiences when popular hits like "Avatar" are in the hunt for best movie.

    The show annually is the second most-watched program on U.S. TV behind professional football's Super Bowl, but this year's Grammy Awards, music's top honors, lured 40 million viewers the night after Whitney Houston's death and could easily surpass the Oscars, which only twice since 2002 has had a larger audience.

    Oscar producers also hope a return of popular comedian Crystal as host of the program for the ninth time will lure viewers. He hasn't been emcee of the show since 2004 when it drew roughly 44 million viewers and box office smash "The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King" was the big winner.

    PAINTING OSCAR PICTURE

    This year "The Artist," a tale of old Hollywood that sees a fading star find redemption through the love of a woman just as silent movies are being taken over by talkies, is widely picked to take home best film by most industry pundits.

    It comes into the night with 10 nominations, second only to Martin Scorsese's "Hugo" with 11. But most of the nods for "Hugo" are in technical categories like cinematography, whereas "The Artist" nominations are spread across several categories.

    "It's unbeatable," said Dave Karger, movie writer for Entertainment Weekly magazine.

    While it faces keen competition from civil rights drama "The Help," "The Artist" has come out on top in most award shows this year. Still, pundits point out that "The Help" did win best ensemble cast from the Screen Actors Guild, and actors make up the biggest group of Oscar voters.

    The third movie that has had Hollywood buzzing this season is family drama "The Descendants," starring George Clooney as a man trying to keep his family together after his cheating wife is hospitalized in a coma. But "Descendants" has failed to spark Oscar voters, and its key win is seen as adapted screenplay.

    The category of best actress features a too-close-to-call race between Viola Davis playing a maid in "The Help" and Meryl Streep as former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher in "The Iron Lady." Tom O'Neil of awards website Goldderby.com calls that race "neck and neck."

    The best actor category sees American Clooney "Descendants" face Frenchman Jean Dujardin, star of "The Artist." For a long time, Clooney seemed to have the upper hand, but Dujardin has won most every time the two have been pitted against each other.

    Supporting actor and actress appear locked for Christopher Plummer, playing an elderly gay man in "Beginners," and Octavia Spencer as one of the black maids in "The Help."

    At age 82, Plummer would be the oldest Oscar winner ever, and if both Spencer and Davis are victorious, then it would be the first time two African American women have won those categories in the same year for the same movie.

    The race for director is widely tipped to go to "The Artist" maker Michel Hazanavicius, but could see a surprise by "Hugo" and Scorsese, Woody Allen with "Midnight in Paris" or Alexander Payne and "The Descendants."

    Finally, Iranian film "A Separation" goes up against Israel's "Footnote" in the category for foreign language film, bringing world politics into the movie industry awards.

    (Reporting By Bob Tourtellotte; Editing by Sandra Maler and Cynthia Osterman)

    How do you feel about this article?

     

    91 comments

    • marco  •  Louisville, United States  •  2 months ago
      I'd like to thank the "ACADEMY' for keeping my wife & kids occupied for a few hrs. a year!
      SWEET SILENCE IN MY GARAGE!!!
      • Elisa 2 months ago
        Lol!
      • marco 2 months ago
        Did you notice the Irony I portrayed in Using CAPS to Refer to silence??? I should win this year for sarcasm!
    • Mel  •  2 months ago
      The best thing about television is the "off" button.
    • ZAP  •  Austin, United States  •  2 months ago
      The People have enough technology now to decide how to spend their time and money. Give them a reason to indulge in your product and they will. But they won't eat cake if they can't even afford bread.
    • EliseB  •  Lynchburg, United States  •  2 months ago
      It won't help that the NBA All Star game is running head to head with the Oscars this year.
      • Kryptik 2 months ago
        They do share a pool of idiots who are easily entertained. Luckily that pool is about the size of Lakes Huron and Michigan, combined.
      • Bob 2 months ago
        The NBA? Is that league still in existence?
      • acitizen 2 months ago
        what is an NBA? I thought that sport died long ago.
    • John  •  2 months ago
      I guess we don't have to watch now that you announced all the winners.
    • al  •  Troy, United States  •  2 months ago
      I couldn't sleep last night worrying about this...
      • Kryptik 2 months ago
        I've found that massive amounts of narcotics and alcohol help me get the rest I need to keep up with this sort of thing.
      • Rudi 2 months ago
        There's a cure for that. It takes about three minutes and only requires one hand.
      • Snake 2 months ago
        Rudi probably gets lots of practice!
    • .  •  2 months ago
      The way these stars go on, you'd swear they're curing cancer!
      • Mel 2 months ago
        How many have killed a terrorist?
    • just me  •  Pensacola, United States  •  2 months ago
      If the public wouldn't waste their time to go see the film, what would ever give anyone the idea they would waste their time watching the un-seen film recieve awards?
      • Observer 2 months ago
        Because it's SUPPOSED to be about quality, not box office.
      • just me 2 months ago
        Observer- that being the case, this article should not have been about keeping the second largest audience, but rather keeping their standards high and being happy with the quality of those that do watch.
      • GoldeneyeNY 2 months ago
        No, Just Me-- the films and winners themselves are about quality - the Awards show is intended to attract viewership based on the draw of celebrity presence, entertainment value, and combining a pool of viewers who appreciate film in general--the pool being audiences of *every* nominated film of the year, not just one. There's a clear and obvious distinction. Observer's point still stands, as does the initial premise of the article.
    • Jj  •  2 months ago
      Suggestion: tell each winner they should say something interesting regarding the award. Instead of getting up on stage and thanking 10 to 20 people nobody ever heard of much less will remember. So boring!
      PLEASE....nobody cares about your hairdresser's third cousin's neighbor's best friends first boyfriend who runs the snack wagon.
    • Clancy  •  Canyon Country, United States  •  2 months ago
      The Oscars is an award show so that the rich Hollywood elite have an event where they pat each other on the back.
    • LUIS P  •  2 months ago
      Oscars? who cares about a bunch of selfish out of touch dummies!
    • Richard A  •  Tampa, United States  •  2 months ago
      Does anybody really care about these egotists and who would want to watch this farce?
    • tom  •  2 months ago
      the arraogance of the oscars. they will try to make people go see a silent back and white movie that they pick for best picture. all the awards this movie has won, has not done anything to make people go see it. they believe they will change all that tonight. if i want to see a silent black & white movie i will watch turner clasic. at least i wont be charged $10 for a movie.
    • Mike  •  Portland, United States  •  2 months ago
      Watch the Oscars? Actually watch? I think I'd rather watch Xanadu.
    • Mel  •  2 months ago
      Entertainment award shows are advertisements.
    • Mel  •  2 months ago
      Must be nice to have hours of free advertisement via award shows where you just stand and be glorified for being overpaid while price-gouging the consumer for a non-essential expense at theaters and through downloads.
    • Action  •  2 months ago
      All I want to see is the list of winners so the next time I go to Redbox I have a few ideas what to rent. To me, that means reading about it on Monday morning, which takes all of five minutes. Spending 3 or more hours watching it is a complete waste of time. I also don't understand the fascination with the women's clothes. They are wearing dresses that cost thousands of dollars (that are usually given to them) and rented diamonds that are worth millions of dollars (yes, they rent jewelry for such occasions, unless they are really, really rich). If I want to see a good looking woman in sexy clothes, a bikini, or no clothes at all, the internet is at my fingertips.
    • Amelie B  •  2 months ago
      Bigest BOTOX tra la la!
    • Val Mordas  •  Slidell, United States  •  2 months ago
      It's because these movies they are nominating have been seen by 1% of the population, tops. Nobody cares who wins. I'm not saying they should nominate mainstream films simply because they are big movies... but eh, try making better mainstream films instead of assuming everyone just wants to see superheros.
    • Kathleen  •  2 months ago
      I predict nobody will watch. This is the most boring show ever. Watch the 1% snobby elite gush over themselves? I think not. Also, the show is way too long.
    POLL
    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options