Corona on Trial

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Picasso's "Guernica" undergoes medical check

    MADRID (AP) — Pablo Picasso's "Guernica," one of the world's most iconic paintings, is getting a full health check as it marks its 75th anniversary.

    A giant robotic machine is taking tens of thousands of microscopic shots of the black-and-white anti-war masterpiece to allow experts to penetrate the work like never before and see its real condition after a hectic life traveling the globe.

    Madrid's Reina Sofia museum — where "Guernica" is housed — has teamed up with Spanish telecommunication company Telefonica to develop the technology, which uses advanced infrared and ultraviolet photography.

    The machine was built so that "Guernica" does not have to make the risky move to a conservation laboratory, where normally such investigative work would be done.

    "The painting is in delicate condition given that it has suffered a lot of movement and many alterations," said Jorge Garcia Gomez-Tejedor, the museum's head of conservation.

    "You could compare it to a major medical checkup in the sense that it needs to be constantly monitored and watched over."

    Every night after the museum shuts its doors — and on Tuesdays when the museum is closed — 'Pablito' as the robotic mechanism has been dubbed, is dragged out and placed roughly a meter from the 27-sq. meter (291-sq. foot) painting.

    Throughout the night the 9-meter (30-ft.) long, 5-meter (16-ft.) tall structure weighing 1.5 tons painstakingly scans the masterpiece, slowly compiling photographic DNA.

    It can be programmed to take the camera lenses closer or farther away from the painting depending on the shot needed and has a precision of movement of 25 microns, or 25 thousandths of a millimeter, allowing analysts to see even air bubbles and scratches undetectable by the human eye.

    "It will give us untold information about the painting," said Humberto Duran, the restoration computer technician who presided over the project's design. Duran said the process will give a complete view of the painting's underlying preparatory drawings and all the later touchups it was subjected to.

    "The principal idea behind the project is to be able to present to the scientific world and the public the state of conservation of the painting," said Garcia Gomez-Tejedor. He said that for the moment "Guernica" does not need to be restored.

    The cost of the machine has not been revealed but leading newspaper El Pais said it was close to euro300,000 ($400,000).

    The painting underwent a similar photographic combing in 1998 albeit with much less advanced camera equipment and without the precision of the robotic machine. That study turned up 129 imperfections — ranging from cracks to creases to marks and stains — all attributed to the painting's hectic past.

    Picasso created "Guernica" as a commission for Spain's Republican government to represent the country at a Universal Exposition in Paris in 1937, as Spain writhed in a bloody civil war started by future dictator Gen. Francisco Franco.

    The painting then went on the road for nearly 20 years, visiting dozens of cities on both sides of the Atlantic. Every time it was moved it had to be taken off its support and rolled up, a process that took its toll over the years.

    The painting made its final trip when it was transferred to Spain in 1981 from New York's Museum of Modern Art, where it had been deposited on a long-term loan by Picasso until democracy was restored in Spain.

    For fear of attack, it was initially housed behind bullet-proof glass and under armed guard at the Prado Museum in Madrid before it was eventually transferred to the Reina Sofia.

    Picasso was a world-renowned figure at the time of its composition and the work quickly became an artistic and political icon.

    The oil-on-canvas piece comprises tormented and distorted figures — human and animal — and represents the horrors of mechanized war. It took its name from Guernica, the ancestral capital of northern Spain's Basque country, which was bombed on April 26, 1937, a spring market day, by German and Italian air forces supporting Franco in a civil war that set the stage for World War II.

    Although estimates of the number of people killed in the bombing vary greatly, town historians say local records show at least 120 deaths.

    The Basque region has long demanded that the painting be moved there, at least temporarily, but both the Reina Sofia and Spain's parliament flatly refuse.

    "The painting is very fragile, its format is big and complex, any movement would involve a lot of risk." said Garcia Gomez-Tejedor.

    How do you feel about this article?

     
    • Bigbobbiek  •  Columbus, United States  •  2 months ago
      The hilarious part is, all these people bashing the painting and Picasso and other artists like him are doing exactly what those artists want: Talking about the art, what it means, and how it makes them feel.

      So, good job. You have fulfilled the artists very wishes.
      • Lois Must Die 2 months ago
        well then i guess since his art never crosses my mind, i am not fulfilling his wish
      • mc 2 months ago
        Gotcha, MT. Ha!
      • Lord of Spheroid 2 months ago
        Why would anyone expect Americans to have any idea about art? It isn't in the schools, it isn't cherished, it isn't supported by the government; it is seen as an inconvenience or area to complain about. It is a tragedy this country should correct.
    • bb  •  2 months ago
      If you do not like this painting, then you should take note that it was not intended to be pretty. It portrays the horrors of War, and called for peace in Europe. He was speaking out against WWII before it even started. he warned against the war which killed millions, ruined countries, and brought about the nuclear bomb. So next time you say "A three year old could do that" take into consideration the message behind the paint, not what a toddler can do.
      • Darkstar 2 months ago
        It doesn't appear that you've even bothered to take the time to read the article. This piece had absolutely nothing to do with WWII. It was to show the horrors of the Spanish Civil War. History is very important. As George Santayana famously said : "Those who can not remember history, are condemned to repeat it"
      • The Walrus 2 months ago
        And those who didn't read the article fully the first time, are doomed to repeat it.
      • JED 2 months ago
        and those who dont shut the f%$# up and move on with your lives are doomed to remain in the present.
    • Tiffanie Heingartner  •  Indianapolis, United States  •  2 months ago
      I've seen this painting in person as I traveled in Spain. It is simply overwhelming in its size and intensity. Profound
      • John bruce 2 months ago
        me too, and yes
      • Frankenstein 2 months ago
        you are easily amused.
      • Frankenstein 2 months ago
        maybe you would have a case of atomic diarea explode in you pants that would shoot out the legs, if you eaver saw a Monet.
    • max  •  Portland, United States  •  2 months ago
      I've had this work hung up in my room since I was 10 and bought my first real (framed) painting. I've stared at it for countless hours. There is such compelling subtlety contained in it, I still discover new patterns and hidden forms when I peer at it carefully from my bed 11 years later.
    • Ult Critic  •  2 months ago
      Sorry folks, this is truly a work of genius. Whatever else Picasso may or may not have done, this is the real thing. It is very powerful when seen in person. The absolute chaos of war is perfectly depicted. It can be felt much more powerfully than if the war scene itself were to be reproduced in a naturalistic style. The horror has distorted even the boundaries of conventional "Art".
      • Frankenstein 2 months ago
        you honestly believe that? I think you are salting the mine.
    • Monkey Doo  •  2 months ago
      Somewhere, Picasso is smiling. With pride or in humor, who knows?
    • Crystal  •  2 months ago
      I never realized when I studied Spanish in high school that this painting was actually that large. I understand why the Basque want the painting, but like they said, it's got to be pretty fragile by now, after having traveled so much. Taking a painting off its stretchers and rolling it up is disastrous for the paint itself, even for flexible media like oil paint. The people who care for it are at least trying their best to preserve it.
    • Keyva  •  Ocala, United States  •  2 months ago
      i wonder, once the machine finds all the problems with the picture will the price of the picture decrease or will it's fragile state make it even more priceless?
    • A Yahoo! User  •  2 months ago
      His way of expressing his messages is so different from other people in a strange but cool way. That's what makes him special out of the rest of the artists.
    • Jn  •  San Diego, United States  •  2 months ago
      For anyone who is Basque, or even an American Basque, this painting's significance is tremendous! True art is only as powerful as the statement it makes to each viewer. It is very personal. For those who understand what this monumental cubist piece by Picasso represents, especially for those of us who have seen it in person, and have had family members share their stories of living through the actual historical, horrendous event, this is a powerful work of art! Those who are ignorant to its significance for so many people, should not make their ignorance obvious with their ridiculous statements. Get an arts education and then you will be more capable of criticizing this artistic and historical masterpiece.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  2 months ago
      I don't really like posting comments on these articles but I saw a lot of nonsense bashing Picasso; so I just had to post this. Anyone who bashes Picasso for lack of artistic skills obviously knows nothing about Picasso: or even further, nothing about art. Picasso was a natural artist; although, he did have his father's help. At a extremely young age (I don't remember exactly, somewhere around 7-13 years of age) he was already painting at a level that most good artist can't even compare to. If you want proof go research Picasso's earlier paintings before Cubism. His representational(realistic) painting was as great as any other great artist. From what I heard his only problem was his composition(placement of objects in the paintings); but his artistic skills was far above amateur. Like I said, go research his earlier paintings before he got into abstraction and cubism. He choose to do abstraction because he felt that abstraction did a much better job at conveying raw emotions. And also because he just wanted to invent something new, something different, which he did; this is why he is consider a genius in the art world.
    • boomshakalaka  •  2 months ago
      one of the most thought provoking paintings ever.....a masterpiece with a message!
    • BYAH!  •  2 months ago
      Like many of you I was unaware of the message behind this meaning but once you see everything depicted in this one art piece you will be surprised! I don't like Picasso but this IS an art piece with meaning. Google it for the meaning.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Chicago, United States  •  2 months ago
      Funny that they write a story about this. Restoration experts perform this procedure on masterpieces by many different artists every day. Including Vermeer, Rembrandt, Van Gogh, and everybody else.
    • Wanda J  •  Camden, United States  •  2 months ago
      I first learned of this painting when I took Spanish in college. This was done t show the horrors of the Spanish Civil War. I also learned more about the painting when I took art history. I like the painting. I have learned to appricaite different art forms. Different art forms often refelect the time period that it was done. One can also learn about the people and their understanding of their time period.
    • Kelven  •  Santa Barbara, United States  •  2 months ago
      Cool! That's all I have to say.
    • Echo  •  2 months ago
      This is how the artist actually intended the painting to be viewed.
    • Lib-Be-Rator  •  Clermont, United States  •  2 months ago
      I don't look @ art , Art looks @ me !
    • Chris N  •  2 months ago
      My favorite painting.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  2 months ago
      I hope to see it in person someday. It was not meant to look nice, but that is why I have so much respect for both this painting and its deceased artist. It conveys such a powerful message.
    POLL
    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options