Corona on Trial

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Singapore warns US on anti-China rhetoric

    Singapore urged the United States to be careful in comments on China, warning that suggestions of a strategy to contain the rising power could cause strife in Asia.

    On a visit to Washington, Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam voiced confidence that the State Department accepted the need for cooperation with China but said that US domestic politics "resulted in some anti-China rhetoric."

    "We in Singapore understand that some of this is inevitable in an election year. But Americans should not underestimate the extent to which such rhetoric can spark reaction which can create a new and unintended reality for the region," he said.

    Singapore is a close partner of Washington and home to a key US military logistical base. But the city-state is highly dependent on trade and has sought smooth commercial relations with Asia's major economic powers such as China, Japan and India.

    "It's quite untenable -- quite absurd -- to speak in terms of containment of China. That's a country with 1.3 billion people," Shanmugam told a conference on Singapore at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

    China "is determined to progress in all fields and take its rightful place in the community of nations. It will succeed in that venture," he said.

    The United States, while looking to trim spending on its giant military to tame a soaring debt, has set a priority on Asia as rapid economic growth and the rise of China look set to reshape the region.

    The US military has sought closer cooperation with the Philippines and Vietnam, which have accused China of increasingly bellicose actions to assert control over disputed territories in the South China Sea.

    Shanmugam said that the United States should also look at other ways of engagement in Asia such as pressing ahead with the Trans-Pacific Partnership, an emerging trade pact that involves at least nine countries.

    It is "a mistake to focus only on the US military presence in the region, to the exclusion of other dimensions of US policy," he said.

    President Barack Obama's administration has repeatedly said that it welcomes the rise of China and will try to find areas for cooperation. Vice President Joe Biden, ahead of a US visit by his counterpart Xi Jinping, called in a statement Wednesday for the two powers to work together on "practical issues."

    Addressing the same conference as Shanmugam, senior US diplomat Kurt Campbell agreed it was "very important we're careful about our rhetoric" and said that the United States wanted a relationship with China "based on the well-being" of both countries.

    "Every country in Asia right now wants a better relationship with China. That's natural and any American strategy in the region has to be based on that fundamental recognition," said Campbell, the assistant secretary of state for East Asia.

    "It is also the case that every country in Asia, I believe, also wants a better relationship with the United States," he said.

    Shanmugam did not cite examples of "anti-China" comments in the United States, but a number of US lawmakers have raised fears about Beijing's rise.

    At a congressional hearing Tuesday, Representative Dana Rohrabacher called for the United States to ramp up support for the Philippines to help the democratic US ally assert its claims in maritime disputes with China.

    "We need to stand as aggressively and as solidly with the Filipino government in their confronting an aggressive, arrogant China -- expansionist China -- as we have stood with them against radical Islam," said Rohrabacher, a Republican from California.

    Economic disputes with China have also come to the forefront.

    In a recent television commercial that outraged Asian American groups, Representative Pete Hoekstra -- a Republican seeking a Senate seat in Michigan -- attacked his opponent with an advertisement criticizing US debt to China.

    In the advertisement, a young Asian woman -- in a setting that looked more like Vietnam than China -- said in broken English, "Your economy get very weak; ours get very good."

    How do you feel about this article?

     

    41 comments

    • Alvin  •  3 months ago
      Singapore = "BALIMBING"
    • lakay  •  Riyadh, Saudi Arabia  •  3 months ago
      singapore is playing neutral but the fact that they allowing american battleship to station in there country, definitely you know which side there on.
    • Czarlee  •  Jakarta, Indonesia  •  3 months ago
      Singapore warn US? ha ha ha ha singapore very small area 1 atomic bomb from US will be your last...
      • Uncle 3 months ago
        Boastful singapore..very little island, one small bomb will wipe out singapore.
    • Vix  •  3 months ago
      It seems Singapore has decided to take a slice at the "sweet deal cake" offered by China. I wonder which other coward Nation in the ASEAN will follow.
      • Eric 3 months ago
        I don't think so, only PAP will follow China and PAP doesn't represent Singapore.
      • Anonymous 3 months ago
        @Vix may be the Philippine is next to taste "sweet deal cake". haha... sunod lang din sa agos but if that happens nakakahiya tayo haha...
    • thewhinemerchant  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  3 months ago
      big mistake everyone here can make is to assume that they are more courageous and braver than their counterparts. the biggest mistake is to assume that one's people/country is smarter or has more ability than others.

      china is starving for resources, no doubt about it. will they flex muscle to get what they can? definitely. will they go to war over this? that remains to be seen.

      what has happened now that the US, another superpower that is definitely more than a match for China, is in the picture? the battle lines are being drawn; and sides are being chosen.

      Singapore is seen to be taking China's side but if China's intentions are truly aggressive, it will not be spared from an invasion. Safe to say, the Singaporeans are looking out for themselves. In the event of war, they might get help but I doubt if they expect any.

      The US will understandably act in accordance with its interests. And right now, there is pressure to blame their own problems on a government other than their own. China is a logical scapegoat here.

      The winds of politics and economics change whenever it suits the countries that benefit from those changes. But even before any inkling of impending war has been conclusively established, the Philippines, through its de facto ambassadors making commentaries here in Yahoo, has again prematurely taken sides in the hope that a superpower will come and fight their future war for them.

      The fact of the matter is, a country like ours, should have learned its lessons in dealing with superpowers. And that lesson is - if we truly deserve to have a country and our own government, we have no need for superpowers to be charitable or to back us up. We only need friends, from all over the world. And it's hard to make genuine friends elsewhere if all we do is to alienate our immediate neighbors by bringing in another bully, all in the name of fighting a neighborhood bully.

      Let's do away with false pride, shall we?
      • side-fish 3 months ago
        this!

        PH military still needs to upgrade though.
      • lovely 2 months ago
        yeah whine merchant. but you and your fellow illustrados who control the most resources in our country, what have you done to strengtened our country. you have done nothing to further our interest as a nation other than being indifferent ?
    • thewhinemerchant  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  3 months ago
      Woe to he who rides on a tiger's back, and falls off it after all other animals have been scared away.
      • TJ Corona 3 months ago
        What have you been smoking or taking or drinking? Lakas ng tama mo.
      • _Lord_Aragorn_ 3 months ago
        Kanina pa yan sa kabilang post. Pakitatagalog nga nyan whine merchant. TAGALOG HA!
      • thewhinemerchant 3 months ago
        Sige. Tagalugin ko - Mas malalakas ang tama ninyo kung sa iisang solusyon lang kayo umaasa. Nililinlang niyo lang mga sarili ninyo kung maniniwala kayong may kakampi tayo dito.

        E kung matapang kayo't naniniwala kayong tutulungan tayo ng Amerika, e di lalo pang dapat paigtingin ang pag-ookupa natin ng mga pulo ng Spratlys.

        Masaya ka na, Lord Aragorn? Tukmol!
    • Emi  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  3 months ago
      Singaporeans, do you know how to fight?
      • Michael 3 months ago
        every singaporean male is conscripted for 2 years in their army, just like in korea. do you know how to fight?
      • Jer 3 months ago
        does the Philippines know how to fight it's own battles? NO and HELL NO. World War II case in point, the US had to defend your asses, and protects. Tell me just one Filipino who died protecting the USA. Can you name just one. Thousand died in this trash dump.
      • Breigh 3 months ago
        of course they do!
    • Eric  •  Singapore, Singapore  •  3 months ago
      Singapore, you don't have any rights to warn U.S, without their investment, you imaging the impact. China will not help us if we become dead meat. While other Asian countries hate China, PAP wants to lick communists' butts?
    • _Lord_Aragorn_  •  3 months ago
      All items made in china is crap! Everything will falls down in a matter of weeks. Even their navies will not last in the high seas coz its made up of fake materials.
    • warlock1106  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  3 months ago
      What do you expect from Singapore? They are predominantly chinese in population. Blood is thicker that water.
    • Tonyong Pinoy  •  3 months ago
      That is easier said by a country such as Singapore which does not have a claim on the Spratlys and whose territory has not been subjected to creeping and gradual invasion and occupation by China. I am a Filipino and I support Washington's containment policy of China. The Chinese simply cannot be trusted.
    • Tonyong Pinoy  •  3 months ago
      We Filipinos do not trust China. Trust is earned. How can you trust someone physically occupying your backyard? Go America !!!
    • penguin39cubed  •  2 months ago
      Can someone here describe the true meaning of Philippine sovereignty please? The truth and nuttin but da truth please. I have a theory but I want to hear from a Fil.
    • Dark  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  3 months ago
      Singapore policies are like China, therefore, both countries are fools. US military bases must expand in Asia to protect ASEAN countries that bullied by china like Philippines and Vietnam.
    • larry  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  3 months ago
      e tsekwa din kasi sila....
    • Tonyong Pinoy  •  3 months ago
      Singapore is geographically a pimple at the tip of Malaya. It has no remote islands to secure. It can easily be invaded and conquered within a day. Its military has no actual battle experience and too few people to act as military reserves.
    • Botchok  •  Berkeley, United States  •  2 months ago
      Singaporean are 99% Chinese blood, what do you expect? Although Singaporean Goverment wants to pay U S just to set up military bases on their tiny country, that is a FACT.
    • Ct  •  Sun Valley, United States  •  2 months ago
      Since when did Singapore reprimand or gives a stern warning to a super power like US? It is like a Flyweight bullying a Heavyweight boxer.
    • NinjaX  •  Houston, United States  •  2 months ago
      what's worse than Chinese?...
      MUSLIM CHINESE= Indo, Malaysia, Singapore
    • Judah  •  Singapore, Singapore  •  3 months ago
      .
    POLL
    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options