Corona on Trial

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Tiny 'Soccer Ball' Space Molecules Could Equal 10,000 Mount Everests

    For the first time, astronomers have discovered the solid form of tiny carbon spheres in deep space inside a vast cloud of particles locked in orbit around two distant stars.

    The carbon spheres, known as buckyballs, are formed from 60 carbon atoms linked together to form a hollow sphere, "like a soccer ball," NASA announced in a statement today (Feb. 22). Astronomers spotted vast quantities of the tiny space balls, enough to create 10,000 Mount Everests, circling a pair of stars 6,500 light-years from Earth.

    "These buckyballs are stacked together to form a solid, like oranges in a crate," said the study's lead author Nye Evans of Keele University in England in a statement. "The particles we detected are miniscule, far smaller than the width of a hair, but each one would contain stacks of millions of buckyballs."

    NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope, a space-based infrared observatory, spotted the buckyballs around the double-star system XX Ophiuchi. The light emitted by the carbon spheres is different than that seen in the gaseous form of buckyballs previously seen in space, allowing scientists to conclude that Spitzer had detected the material in its solid form, researchers said.

    Buckyballs are also known as buckminsterfullerene. They take their name from the geometric arrangement of their carbon atoms, which resembles the geodesic dome designs of the late architect Buckminster Fuller.

    On Earth, buckyballs can be used in superconductors, medicines, water purifiers and armor, NASA officials explained. They can form naturally as a gas from burning candles and appear in solid form in rock minerals.

    Buckyballs can also be created artificially and appear as a solid dark "goo" in test tubes, NASA officials said.

    But astronomers had never seen the solid form of buckyballs in space until now.

    NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope detected the first signs of gaseous buckyballs in space in 2010, and ultimately found enough of the material to fill 15 of Earth's moons inside the Small Magellanic Cloud, a small neighboring galaxy to our own Milky Way.

    However, knowing that gaseous material can coalesce into solid buckyballs such as those spotted by Spitzer takes the cake, researchers said.

    "This exciting result suggests that buckyballs are even more widespread in space than the earlier Spitzer results showed," said Mike Werner, NASA's Spitzer telescope project scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. "They may be an important form of carbon, an essential building block for life, throughout the cosmos."

    The research is detailed in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

    This story has been corrected to reflect that buckyballs are made up of 60 carbon atoms, not molecules.

    Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

    How do you feel about this article?

     

    30 comments

    • Alicia  •  Indianapolis, United States  •  3 months ago
      And if you care to scroll around you can take a tour of the blatant ignorance of 'it isn't true because my brain is too feeble to comprehend it"
    • Jim Em  •  3 months ago
      I am not shocked that there are scientifically illiterate people. I am amazed that those people will try to shoot down the very science that they do not even begin to understand. I'm a pretty smart person, but I'd never argue with an expert on a subject that I know nothing about. I might argue with a astrophysicist over the authorship of Shakespeare's plays, but not over the existence of buckyballs in space
      • Chief 3 months ago
        I don't have a foggy clue what their talking about, but at least I have enough common sense to shut up and listen.....Good post Jim!
      • Jim Em 3 months ago
        I prefer to think of it as only speak when you have valid reason to do so. If we don't trust the experts we end up following some charming fool. Trust but verify.
      • cantdrive85 3 months ago
        Well said, your public school education did exactly as it was intended to do, don't question authority.
    • Reality Check  •  Gardena, United States  •  2 months ago
      Just one question. How can they see something "miniscule, far smaller than the width of a hair" "inside a vast cloud" "6,500 Light years" away?
      If you were to ask Jim Em, he would call me " scientifically ignorant", but being the ignorant offspring of an engineer family, the logic and most importantly, the proof is missing, sorry. If your gonna say something, back it up with facts that can be proved, not assumptions based on an educated guess.
      • Jim Em 2 months ago
        Because we have created buckyballs in labs on earth, we know their properties. We know the spectrum that would be created by starlight passing through a cloud of buckyballs in gaseous form or through a cloud of buckyballs in solid form. With spectroscopic observation of light patterns passing through clouds of any substance in space, we can tell what those clouds are made of. We can tell how large the cloud is by the width and breadth of starfield it obscures, and how thick it is by how much light gets through it. So we don't have to "see" a thing to know it is there. There are many ways to know besides "seeing". For example, when a planet passes in front of a distant star, we can measure the changing pattern of light from the star. We therefore know a planet has passed in front of it though it is too small to see from earth even with our most powerful telescopes. Likewise, we can calculate the size of the planet from the amount of light it obscures and the speed of its orbit by how long it takes to cross the face of the star and re-emerge after an orbit. We can calculate the mass of the planet by the amount of "wobble" observed in the star's position in space. We can determine it's chemical makeup through spectroscopic analysis. The point of all this is that we can know a great deal of information about a things that we cannot see. Even more amazing is that we knew to look for these things before we had ever seen them in space. We knew from our observations of their earthly counterparts that they should form under natural conditions, and even how and where to search for them. This is an example of a theory being proved by observation in the real world. Now, I am not a scientist myself, and I am sure my explanation is lacking in technical detail. But I have read enough to know that this is a general picture of how these things work.
    • DavidW  •  Los Angeles, United States  •  3 months ago
      Love these units of measurement. Ah yes, the "Mount Everest" unit. LOL...I know people are stupid and can't comprehend numbers larger than 15, but really?
      • Huh 3 months ago
        Yeah, I always find that funny too. I have never been to Mount Everest and have no idea how big it actually is, although I have heard that it is quite big. I have never seen a nuclear bomb go off in person, so telling me how many Hiroshimas a volcanic blast is probably isn't going to be useful information.
      • Yoda 3 months ago
        At least they didn't tell us how many could fill the empire state building
    • Bill  •  3 months ago
      Spaceballs? I'd better put on my big dark helmet.
      • PhilipT 2 months ago
        may the schwartz be with...lol
    • UNCLE MEAT  •  Fort Myers, United States  •  3 months ago
      This stuff is way over my head !!
      • Trivia Jones 3 months ago
        Probably because at least half of what they say is pure Bullshirt!
      • Bad Habit 3 months ago
        ^^^ Trivial, you idiot, he's making a joke. The same tired joke he posts to every article about space.
    • Anonymous  •  Green Bay, United States  •  3 months ago
      And some people still think that complex molecules cannot form on their own.
    • Hesperos  •  3 months ago
      Carbon does love to combine with itself and with other elements: graphite, buckyballs, diamond, CO2, methane, cats, dogs, people.....
    •       •  3 months ago
      LUDACRIS SPEED!
    • ronnyo  •  Chicago, United States  •  3 months ago
      Aren't these the things that Chuck-E-Cheese put in their pizzas to calm down kids?
    • Mike  •  Tampa, United States  •  3 months ago
      lets go for a visit there.
    • Yoda  •  Randolph, United States  •  3 months ago
      I wonder how many buckyballs could fill an olympic swimming pool? I love how they simplify this stuff for us.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Irvine, United States  •  3 months ago
      It's nice how they stress armor.. you know the government will be all over that before they research the other part's.. ie. medicine and water puricfication.
    • Actor  •  3 months ago
      Can anyone explain why this type of news is not the first thing we think of when we think of U.S. high school students? ... anyway, its pretty fascinating.
    • NathanielT  •  Phoenix, United States  •  3 months ago
      Spaceballs? there goes the neighborhood
    • Dan  •  Tulsa, United States  •  3 months ago
      Yay!!! Now find an economical way to harvest them and we are in business. Carbon cable anyone? Almost indestructible.
    • Allen Williams  •  Chicago, United States  •  3 months ago
      At least the name given isn't fifty syllables long and almost impossible to pronounce!!!
    • Joe  •  3 months ago
      maybe bucky should put his balls back in his pants....
    • kozz  •  3 months ago
      not useful for life, too big and clunky and symmetric. Methane, ethane, propane, benzene, that's where it's at. Then you can throw in some nitrogen, phosphorus and oxygen and make neat stuff happen.
    • Milton Stapler  •  3 months ago
      "Buckyballs"... Is that the technical term? The universe is so fascinating that we have buckyballs floating around out there. Maybe they will find a 'purple nurple' one day. Or even... some 'loogies'?
    POLL
    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options