Corona on Trial

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

 

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    As US Navy shrinks, China launches more, better war ships

    HONG KONG — As looming budget cuts force the Pentagon to plan for a smaller US navy, China is accelerating the launch of new, increasingly capable warships as part of a sustained drive to become a major maritime power.

    Shanghai's Hudong Zhonghua Shipbuilding Company late last month launched the fourth of China's new 071 amphibious landing ships according to reports carried by Chinese military web sites and the state-controlled media.

    While most attention has been drawn to the ongoing sea trials of China's first aircraft carrier, military analysts say the expanding fleet of 20,000-ton landing ships, the biggest domestically designed and built vessels in the Chinese navy, delivers a far more immediate boost to Beijing's global influence.

    "Having a significant fleet of large amphibious assault vessels clearly suggests a desire for power projection," says Christian Le Miere, a maritime security researcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.

    "If you want the surgical insertion of forces, for a range of reasons, then you need amphibious response ships."

    Military rivalry China's naval buildup comes amid mounting maritime tensions in the Asia-Pacific region, which is likely to be one of the main geopolitical stress points in the coming decade.

    Military planners previously had focused mainly on a potential conflict in the Taiwan strait. More recently, however, Japan and China have locked horns over islands each claims in the East China Sea; Vietnam, the Philippines and other nations are disputing territorial claims with China over parts of the South China Sea thought to be rich in oil and gas.

    The US Navy has announced it will deploy its own new amphibious assault vessels, the Littoral Combat Ships, to the "maritime crossroads" of the Asia-Pacific theater, stationing them in Singapore and perhaps the Philippines.

    Xi Jinping, the man destined to become China's new president later this year, called for enhanced military cooperation between the Pacific powers during a meeting with US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta on Monday in Washington.

    Xi, the son of a famous guerrilla commander from the 1930s, also met with President Barack Obama and was treated to a rare show of honors at the Pentagon, including on a 19-gun salute.

    But Panetta, alluding to the strains in the relationship, called for more transparency from Beijing about its military build-up.

    Largest shipbuilder The Chinese navy is expected to deploy up to eight of the type 071 ships that can carry up to 800 troops, hovercraft, armored vehicles and medium lift helicopters. The first of the class launched in 2006, the Kunlunshan, has already deployed with Chinese naval forces to the Indian Ocean and the pace of construction appears to have quickened with the third and fourth vessels completed within the last five months.

    And, military commentators and retired Chinese naval officers say, early design work has already started on a bigger, more capable landing ship.

    For the Chinese navy, the country's thriving commercial shipbuilding industry is providing a springboard for further improvements in the size and sophistication of new classes of warships, military experts say.

    China in 2010 overtook South Korea to become the world's biggest shipbuilder and industry experts say the leading state-owned shipyards are steadily improving skills and technology with the launch of bigger and more complex oil tankers, container ships and other, more specialized vessels.

    Along with more than two decades of rapid growth in military spending, this shipbuilding expertise has transformed the Chinese navy from an obsolete, coastal defense force to a blue water fleet that is expanding its influence into the Pacific and Indian Oceans.

    China's best warships and submarines are now armed with advanced air defense weapons and long range, anti-ship missiles.

    In its annual report to Congress on the Chinese military, the Pentagon last year said the People's Liberation Army (PLA) navy now has about 75 major warships, more than 60 submarines, 55 medium and heavy amphibious ships and about 85 smaller, missile-armed fast attack craft.

    As a major trading power with a growing dependence on imported energy and raw materials, this naval expansion is crucial for the country's security, according to Chinese military planners.

    "The safety of China's personnel, assets and shipping lanes is very important for its economy," wrote Senior Captain Wang Xiaoxuan, the director of the PLA's Naval Research Institute, in the official China Daily newspaper last month. "To guarantee this, it needs a strong navy."

    Shrinking US Navy

    Military strategists dismiss crude comparisons between navies based on the number of ships alone and most experts agree that the US navy with its 285-strong fleet including 11 aircraft carriers, more than 70 nuclear powered submarines and 22 cruisers remains the world's overwhelmingly, dominant navy.

    In size, firepower, integration with other important weapons systems and battle experience, the best US warships enjoy a clear advantage over those of China and most combatants from other navies.

    However, it is also clear that under the Obama administration's plan to shave almost $487 billion from the Pentagon budget over the coming decade, the US navy will shrink as China's fleet continues to grow in size and quality.

    To meet its budget target, the US navy proposes to retire seven cruisers and two amphibious vessels, delay work on new ships and submarines and scrap some programs, which could see the fleet shrink to less than 250 ships, according to senior Pentagon officials.

    These cuts come as the Obama administration mounts a "pivot" to Asia following the US withdrawal from Iraq and anticipated exit from Afghanistan.

    As part of this effort to boost defense cooperation in Asia, the US military is now holding its annual Cobra Gold joint exercises, which run until February 17 in Thailand with troops from the host country, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea and Japan. It will hold joint naval exercises next month with the Philippines near the disputed Spratly islands.

    Second-ranked spender

    This shift of military firepower to Asia and renewed emphasis on building closer ties with traditional, regional allies is partly aimed at countering the rapid growth of Chinese military muscle.

    After more than two decades of double digit growth, the annual expansion of China's official military outlays dropped to 7.5 per cent in 2010 in the aftermath of the global financial crisis but spending bounced back last year with a 12.7 per cent increase to $91.5 billion.

    Most foreign analysts believe China understates its defense budget.

    The Pentagon estimates total Chinese military outlays in 2010 were more than $160 billion, which would easily make it the second-ranked defense spender behind the US.

    The Obama administration is proposing to spend $525 billion on the military in 2013.

    For the expanding Chinese navy, the widely publicized deployment of the refurbished, former Ukrainian aircraft carrier, the Varyag, on its sea trials last year was seen as an important milestone in China's bid to become a major sea power.

    However, most Chinese and foreign experts believe it will be years before the carrier will be operationally ready with aircraft, weapons and supporting vessels.

    Protecting overseas nationals

    In contrast, military analysts say the amphibious landing ships already provide Beijing the option of deploying troops and their equipment in wartime or in response to less serious peacetime contingencies, including operations to protect the more than 800,000 Chinese nationals working overseas.

    "In non-combat roles, they are more meaningful than an aircraft carrier," says Gabe Collins, an Ann Arbor, Michigan-based specialist on maritime affairs for the China SignPost research group.

    "They are geared to using choppers, troops, hovercraft and even armored vehicles. Now they can say: 'We've just had three people kidnapped here, let's go and do something about it'."

    More ominously, for smaller regional powers, these ships could also be used to land Chinese troops on disputed territory in the South China Sea, analysts say.

    However, it is in so-called "soft power" that the amphibious landing vessels could make their initial contribution as China attempts to reassure regional nations that its growing military might poses no threat.

    The Chinese military clearly recognized that the US was able to gain substantial goodwill from its effective response to the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami with its aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships ferrying supplies, medical teams and rescue crews ashore, according to Chinese and Western commentators.

    Some analysts believe this experience was a factor in Beijing's decision to launch its first, large, military hospital ship that could be deployed to assist other nations in times of crisis as well as support Chinese amphibious forces in combat.

    The hospital ship, launched in 2007, was late last year deployed on a humanitarian medical mission to Latin America and the Caribbean. — Reuters

    How do you feel about this article?

     

    13 comments

    • joseph  •  Luanda, Angola  •  2 months ago
      PHIIPPINES BEWARE AND GET READY FOR ANY EVENTUALITY. BE READY AND DO NOT WAIT UNTIL THE ENEMY IS AT THE GATE!
      • Philip 2 months ago
        The problem here is that their Military Leaders are always Stealing from the Military budget.
    • Nel  •  2 months ago
      I hope and I wish the US will station its amphibious assault vessel to the Philippines.
      China will think trice before entering our territory for sure.
      God Bless the Philippines and United States.
      My country is always protected in Jesus name.
    • Nereus  •  Amsterdam, The Netherlands  •  2 months ago
      BEWARE OF THE RISEN DRAGON
    • gayweather jr.  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  2 months ago
      its better for chinese to use that ships for humanitarian purposes in times of natures calamity around the world..people will thanks them and will patronize chinese products..than they will use them in troops landing in taiwan,disputes spratley islands and other invasion ambitions of chinese..and people around the world will trash chinese products and black list them in the market if they design that to kill people they want to occupy the area like what they did to slaughtered a vietnamese navy they encountered few years ago around 2010.in a disputed areas in spratleys.
    • jovenill  •  Cebu, Central Visayas  •  2 months ago
      These Landing Ships has only one Purpose. SEABORNE INVASION!
      just 2 of these Ships can land 1600 chinese marines and enough war materials to INVADE AND OVERCOME the Biggest Island in the West Philippine Seas, the Pag Asa island!!
      With our Pathetic military and politicians squabbling around in a futile exercises.
      LETS ALL SAY GOODBYE TO OUR STAKES IN THE WEST PHILIPPINE SEAS!
    • Jose  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  3 months ago
      if the number of warships will become the determinant in naval power projection despite the US reduction of warships, do not forget that all retired US warships goes into mothball process meaning they could stil be called upon in a major world crisis....
      • Philip 2 months ago
        Actually Jose it is High Technology that will win the day over just simple numbers of Warships.
    • Iligan  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  3 months ago
      All of their SHIPS are SUBSTANDARD....one light of a MATCH, all will burn and sink.......just think of their export products.....all are tainted, substandard and of course FAKE(imitated and pirated)
    • Philip  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  2 months ago
      Think about this - the United States has at least 70 Nuclear Powered Submarines that are capable of launching Missiles with Atomic Warheads. Who knows where those Subs are at any given time? The Missiles can be launched from below Water and they will be on their way and they will never see where they were launched from. Even if the U.S. didn't also have 11 Carrier Groups or any other Ships these 70 Submarines alone are enough to tip the Balance of Power. One of these Nuclear Powered Subs could be in Manila Bay right now and no one would know because these Subs are equipped with Stealth Technology. THEY CAN RUN SILENT AND THEY CAN RUN DEEP.
    • Philip  •  Manila, National Capital Region  •  2 months ago
      Beware Philippines of the Communists who have infiltrated your Universities. You have Pro-China Communiists on your Doorstep.
    • true democrat  •  3 months ago
      paid for with US tax payer dollars, thanks obuger
    • Active citizen  •  2 months ago
      WEll the news didn't told us that the US states only need 8 of the carrier battle groups to destroy the entire chinese military. Yes, the Chinese fleet has increased, but its way too far from the US fleet. Yes the Chinese has an aircraft carrier, but it can't even carry a plane yet, while the US is building another more advance carrier, more advance than the Nimitz class carrier. Well, I think, before they commission the entire Nimitz class carriers, I bet they will really appreciate it when they get a taste of china,
      • no way... 2 months ago
        If US think they are they can destroy Chinese military then why US cannot invade N.KOREA for making neuclear. unlike Irag & Agfanistan they invade them easily. it"s mean US fear CHINA.
      • no way... 2 months ago
        US is a coward country they can"t do along without NATO.
      • Philip 2 months ago
        Spoken like the TRUE COMMUNIST ASSHOLE THAT YOU ARE BULOK !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • China Suckers  •  3 months ago
      chinese mongoloid on the rise....?

      pathetic........
    • iMAN  •  3 months ago
      China on the rise? So what? anjan naman si Pinoy. ewan ko lang kung hindi sila ipa-impeach. hehe
    POLL
    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options