Jesus Christ: acquitted on appeal?

If the case of Jesus was brought on appeal today and in our democratic world, the decision to execute him could have been enjoined from occurring, and would have been eventually reversed.

This is because an appellant in his situation could have raised and argued several errors. Among them would have been as follows:

First error: The arrest of Jesus was made without a warrant, and was therefore illegal.

The band of soldiers and members of the Supreme Sanhedrin arrested Jesus without any written authority. Under Jewish law at that time, the only instance when an arrest could be made without a warrant was, as it is with us today, when a person to be arrested was committing a crime.

Second error: The Supreme Sanhedrin that convicted Jesus was unlawfully constituted, and therefore did not have jurisdiction to try such an offense involving the death penalty.

The reason for this is that the hearings involving Jesus' death were at night and conducted with undue haste, all of which, therefore, rendered the trial irregular.

Pursuant to Jewish laws at those times, a capital offense could only be tried during the day. Thus, the trial of Jesus should have been suspended because the trial was being conducted at night. Still another reason was that it was prohibited to conduct trial such as the one of Jesus, on the eve of Sabbath.

The Jews, believing that it was a grave matter for human life to be taken as a result of trial, gave judges time for serious reflection and prayer before imposing the sentence of death upon anyone.

Moreover, the hearings on Jesus' trial, which were first made before the Supreme Sanhedrin and afterwards before Pilate, were finished on the same day, and only within the period of seven hours. The hearings were concluded hastily in order for the Supreme Sanhedrin to avoid any opposition from Jesus' supporters.

Third error: Jesus' trial, which involved the death sentence, was conducted in an improper venue, and was therefore invalid.

Jewish law prohibited that a person be tried and meted out a sentence of death anywhere other than in court. Yet, after being seized by the mob, Jesus was brought for trial to the house of the high priest.

Fourth error: Members of the Supreme Sanhedrin were disqualified to act as magistrates in the trial of Jesus, such that their verdict amounted to one that was void.

Under the Jewish Law, one who bore personal motives for or against the accused prevented such person from being a magistrate in the case of the accused.

Here, the accuser of Jesus was Annas, who was a member of the Supreme Sanhedrin. He was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, the presiding chairman. The five sons of Annas were also members of the Supreme Sanhedrin. Thus, the members consisted of the accuser himself, and six others who were related to the accuser. All of them convicted Jesus and voted for his death.

Fifth error: The charges against Jesus were changed several times, such that Jesus could not have been accorded due process of law.

At the start of the trial before the Sanhedrin, Jesus was charged with Sedition on the allegation that he was going to destroy the physical Temple in Jerusalem and build it in three days. This charge was abandoned. Trial proceeded against Jesus but this time, on the charge of blasphemy. Then, before Pilate, the charge of blasphemy was dropped, and, on the basis of Jesus having spoken of a new Kingdom being imminent, substituted this for still another one: "high treason" against Ceasar.

Those in the Sanhedrin were uncertain that their charge of blasphemy would be accepted by Pilate, given that such charge was but for an offense against the Jews. To be certain that Jesus was done away with, and because they did not want to kill Jesus themselves, the enemies of Jesus changed the charge to high treason, the most serious crime, and which, being political in nature, was over one on which the Romans exercised jurisdiction.

Sixth error: The conviction of Jesus violated the Rules on Evidence.

Even if Jesus could be considered to have rendered an admission so as to be considered as having committed blasphemy, still, according to Jewish Law during Jesus' time, no attempt could be made to lead a man to commit self-incrimination, especially if the penalty that resulted was death. A voluntary confession by him was not admissible in evidence, and therefore not competent to convict him. This was unless there came forward at least two witnesses whose testimonies were consistent in corroborating his self-incrimination. No such witnesses were presented.

Seventh error: Jesus was deprived of any opportunity to present evidence at his trial.

The Sanhedrin pronounced him guilty of blasphemy, without even exerting effort to determine whether his claim was true. But Jesus could have had many witnesses to prove his claim. And, had they known of his arrest, they would have appeared before the Supreme Sanhedrin to testify in his favor. Aside from Jesus' own disciples, these people were those who saw Jesus perform miracles either on them or on persons whom they knew.

These were, among many others, the leper, the paralytics, the man who was blind from birth and given the gift to see, the widow's son who was resurrected, the crippled woman, the Roman centurion's servant who was healed, the blind Bartimaeus in Jericho who was cured, Lazarus who was brought back to life after several days in his grave. All of them would have avowed as to the holiness of Jesus.

If they were not sufficient to convince those in trial that Jesus was indeed the Son of God, many others would have come forward to testify that they saw Jesus walk on the sea, and that they saw him feed crowds with a mere handful of fishes and few loaves of bread. Others would have testified as to having witnessed Jesus baptized by John and having heard the voice from the skies declare, "This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased!"

Eighth error: The decision to execute Jesus was contrary to the findings and conclusions made.

Pilate declared to the public three times that he found no crime committed by Jesus. Yet, he incongruously still allowed the execution of Jesus.

A review of the case of Jesus and a perusal of the arguments raised would show that the errors committed in Jesus' trial constituted severe violations, particularly of the right to due process of law. They were violations then, and are violations now - whether committed in Jerusalem or anywhere else.

Given all of these, Jesus would have been acquitted from his unjust and unfair trial, and any appeal from it would have readily caused it to be set aside.

(The author is currently a Justice of the Court of Appeals, and is a former regular columnist of Manila Bulletin.)

Loading...

Editor’s note:Yahoo Philippines encourages responsible comments that add dimension to the discussion. No bashing or hate speech, please. You can express your opinion without slamming others or making derogatory remarks.

  • Lupita Nyong'o's $150,000 Oscars dress stolen from hotel
    Lupita Nyong'o's $150,000 Oscars dress stolen from hotel

    The $150,000 pearl-studded, custom-made Calvin Klein dress worn by Oscar-winning actress Lupita Nyong'o at this year's Academy Awards has been stolen, police said on Thursday. The gown, embellished with 6,000 natural white pearls, was stolen from Nyong'o's room at the London Hotel in West Hollywood, during the day on Wednesday, a spokesman for the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department in West Hollywood said. "Ms Nyong'o was not in the room at the time of the theft," Deputy John Mitchell …

  • National Geographic 'Afghan girl' in Pakistan papers probe
    National Geographic 'Afghan girl' in Pakistan papers probe

    Pakistani officials are investigating after the famous green-eyed "Afghan girl" immortalised in a 1985 National Geographic magazine cover was found living in the country on fraudulent identity papers. The haunting image of the then 12-year-old Sharbat Gula, taken in a refugee camp by photographer Steve McCurry, became the most famous cover image in the magazine's history. Now Pakistani officials say that Gula applied for a Pakistani identity card in the northwestern city of Peshawar in April …

  • South Korea decriminalises adultery, condom shares soar
    South Korea decriminalises adultery, condom shares soar

    South Korea's Constitutional Court on Thursday struck down a controversial adultery law which for more than 60 years had criminalised extra-marital sex and jailed violators for up to two years. The decision saw shares in the South Korean firm Unidus Corp., one of the world's largest condom manufacturers, soar by the daily limit of 15 percent on the local stock exchange. "Even if adultery should be condemned as immoral, state power should not intervene in individuals' private lives," said …

  • ‘Noy angered by previous SAF failures to get Marwan’
    ‘Noy angered by previous SAF failures to get Marwan’

    Supt. Raymund Train, who led the SAF team that killed Marwan in Mamasapano, Maguindanao on Jan. 25, recounted in a sworn statement the meeting he and senior SAF officers had with Aquino in Malacañang on Nov. 30. Train said among the senior officers who attended the meeting were then PNP chief Director General Alan Purisima, SAF chief Director Getulio Napeñas, SAF deputy commander Chief Supt. Noli Taliño and intelligence group chief Senior Supt. Fernando Mendez. …

  • U.S. flies most advanced surveillance plane from Philippines

    By Manuel Mogato MANILA (Reuters) - The United States has begun flying its most advanced surveillance aircraft, the P-8A Poseidon, out of the Philippines for patrols over the South China Sea, the U.S. Navy said on Thursday, acknowledging the flights for the first time. The United States, the Philippines' oldest and closest ally, has promised to share "real time" information on what is happening in Philippine waters as China steps up its activities in the South China Sea. China claims most of …

  • NYC, Orthodox Jews reach deal on circumcision suction ritual
    NYC, Orthodox Jews reach deal on circumcision suction ritual

    NEW YORK (AP) — The city said Tuesday it has reached a tentative agreement with members of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish community over a tradition known as oral suction circumcision. …

  • US-led strikes on IS after group seizes 220 Christians
    US-led strikes on IS after group seizes 220 Christians

    The US-led coalition has carried out air strikes against the Islamic State group in northeastern Syria, where the jihadists have launched a new offensive and kidnapped 220 Assyrian Christians. The raids on Thursday struck areas around the town of Tal Tamr in Hasakeh province, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said, without giving information on possible casualties. The town remains under the control of Kurdish forces, but at least 10 surrounding villages have been seized by IS, along …

  • Vatican seeks to quell Mexican anger over pope's drug remark
    Vatican seeks to quell Mexican anger over pope's drug remark

    VATICAN CITY (AP) — The Vatican sought Wednesday to defuse a diplomatic tiff with Mexico after Pope Francis referred to the possible "Mexicanization" of his native Argentina from drug trafficking, the latest instance of Francis' casual speaking style getting him into trouble. …

POLL

Should Aquino be held accountable over the Mamasapano operations?

Loading...
Poll Choice Options